December 21, 2020

Why Research Shows A Low Carb Diet Isn’t Best For Fat Loss

by ironparadisefitness

Why Research Shows A Low Carb Diet Isn’t Best For Fat Loss

If you love a low carb diet, this article will put your bias to the test. Evidence-based nutrition is not about picking a tribe and defending dogmatic rhetoric. You need to be teachable and open to new research as it becomes available. Of course, one study won’t always cause a seismic shift in scientific opinion. But it may add to the debate and alter out thinking somewhat.

Before we get started if you’d prefer to listen to the audio version of this article, click the play button below.

The Low Carb Diet Vs The Low Fat Diet: Study Background

Low Carb Diet Iron Paradise Fitness Training And Nutrition Articles

This article relates to a 2020 study by Hall et al. The study compared a low-fat vegan diet vs a low-carb Keto diet. Already low carb diet stalwarts might be getting nervous. And once you see the results, a few people might be sore in the nutritional butthole. Because the study challenges long-standing views and rhetoric yet again. So the question is, are you open to new evidence or are you already on the defensive before we even get started?

Before we look at the detail of the study, it’s worth noting one thing. The research wasn’t designed to tell you which diet is best for fat loss. It was not a weight-loss study. Researchers shielded participants from weight measurements, so as not to influence their behaviour. They even forced them to wear loose-fitting clothes during the study. The study is also not claiming that a vegan diet is better than an omnivorous one, or vice versa. So don’t interpret the findings in this way. To do so would be a little gimpish—new word, claiming it.

So what did the study focus on? The study looked at whether a low carb diet helps with appetite suppression. The idea being that lower postprandial insulin seen in a low carb diet aids satiety. So with that out of the way, let’s get into the meat and low-carb potatoes of this one.

Study Design

Low Carb Diet Iron Paradise Fitness Training And Nutrition Articles

Researchers controlled all food intake of the participants, which is significant. There was no room for miscalculation of calories. No misreporting of intake or hiding the 5 doughnuts someone had for lunch. The degree of control gives the study a high degree of reliability. A good start, you might say.

Participants were split into 2 groups, 10 in each group. Group 1 had a macro breakdown of 75% Fat, 15% Protein, and 10% Carbs. The second group ate 75% Carbs, 15% Protein, and 10% fat–this group was the vegan group.

For 2 weeks participants ate 3 meals a day (+ snacks) with the prescribed macro breakdown. The food made available was twice their estimated maintenance calories. Subjects could eat as much or as little as they wanted until they reached the point of fullness. Then, after 2 weeks, subjects switched to the alternative diet. So, if the Keto advocates are right, the study should show that those on the low carb diet should eat less. But what did the study show?

The Results

Low Carb Diet Iron Paradise Fitness Training And Nutrition Articles

Well, the study didn’t back up the low carb diet theory. In fact, those following the low-fat diet consumed on average 689 kcals less per day, compared to the high-fat group. And that’s a huge difference. Especially if you’re trying to manage your nutrition and control calories.

The low carb diet group did burn around 166 kcals more per day, which offset some of the extra food intake. But not enough to balance the elevated intake. And, to a degree, you would expect elevated activity levels with so many extra calories.

One thing that Keto stalwarts will jump on straight away is the length of the study.

“If they were only on the diet for 2 weeks, then they wouldn’t have been in ketosis. The study needs to be much longer to be a fair reflection of reality.”

Hmmm. Nice theory, but it doesn’t seem to play out that way in the study. In week 2, participants achieved maximal levels of ketones in the bloodstream. So what did this do for appetite and calorie intake? A bit, but not much. Hunger did decrease in week 2 for the low carb diet group, yet they still consumed c.544 kcals more per day. Again, not an insignificant amount of calories.

A Word On Weight Loss

Although this wasn’t a weight-loss study, it highlighted show some interesting outcomes. Those on the low carb diet lost 1.8kg over the course of the 2 weeks. “That’s great!” you might think. But here’s the kicker. 1.6kg of that wasn’t fat. It was weight loss related to glycogen, water fluctuations, and other variables. In comparison, the low-fat group lost 1kg of body fat. So a great reminder that focusing on scale weight is deceiving. I mean, what would you prefer? To see 1.8kg reduction on the scale, but only 0.2kg of it to be from fat, or a 1kg reduction, with less than 0.2kg coming from FFM? I know which one I’ll be aiming for.

So if this study wasn’t designed to tell you which diet is best for fat loss, what is it saying?

The Low Carb Diet: Study Outcomes And Takeaways

Here are the highlights and take-home messages from the study.

  • The notion that high-fat diets fill you up appears to be a non-evidence-based view.
  • You do not need to lower carb intake to lose fat and control calories.
  • The idea that carbs elevate insulin, which increases hunger and causes weight gain, is a myth.
  • An untracked Keto diet might not be the best way to manage your nutrition.

Don’t get me wrong, a low carb diet can work for a variety of people for a variety of goals. So ‘if it works for you’ then great. But think twice about flooding social media with your N=1 experience that ignores the prevailing evidence. Like many things, just because it worked for you, doesn’t mean it will work for others.


The Next Step In Achieving Your Fitness Goals

Online Coaching Iron Paradise Fitness

Now you’re clear about the low carb diet, what about the other pieces of the puzzle? Are you confident in managing all aspects of your training and nutrition? And can you keep yourself accountable to ensure you maintain consistency? If you’re unsure, my online coaching programme is worth a moment of your attention.

The Lean Life Method can help you lose fat, build muscle, and achieve the body you’ve been striving for. 121 coaching takes the guesswork out of training and nutrition. Join The Lean Life Method and you’ll learn a simple, stress-free way to achieve your fitness goals. And you’ll feel more confident than ever before. And there’s no need to torture yourself in the gym, avoid wine and pizza, or kill your social life in the process.
I’m guessing you’ve spent thousands on pills, powders, and programmes that delivered nothing. So you might be wondering what’s different about me? The simple truth is this… I get results. And I’ll teach you everything you need to know, so you can maintain those results.  So answer me this.
  • How much precious time do you waste trying to figure out what’s right, instead of making progress?

  • Are you sick and tired of never seeing the results your hard effort deserves?

  • How much stress and frustration is your lack of progress adding to your life?

A lack of clarity might be holding you back from living the leaner, healthier life you deserve.


Find out more

Click here to see the results, people like you, are getting with The Lean Life Method. And if you think personal coaching is exactly what you’re looking for click here for more information.

But for now, all I’ll say is, thanks so much for reading, keep living the Lean Life. And I’ll see you soon.

P.S. If you want to follow me on Instagram, go here.


calorie deficit, keto, low carb diet, weight loss

You may also like

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}

Want to know how many calories you should be eating?

Give me your email address, and I'll give you access to my free online calorie and macro calculator. It will tell you how much you need to eat to lose fat and build muscle, in less than 60 seconds.